Audi A5 Forum & Audi S5 Forum banner

Manual to Tiptronic

24K views 80 replies 22 participants last post by  samo316  
I am pretty sure that the 2010 Manual 0-60 is around 4.9 seconds. The Tip is about 5.6-5.7. That is a big difference when you are sprinting to 60 in only 5 seconds.

When we are talking about the RS5 dual clutch, then that is a whole other ball game -- yes, that beast is quick!
 
I'm sure that I would like it -- however, to squeeze out the most performance from the S5 (if you want to do that) then you really need the manual. Especially if you want to modify it. How much would you pay to shave off 0.8 secs off of your 0-60? Well, it's free (or actually cheaper) than the tip box if you simply go manual.
 
All great advice guys so thanks. I think it seems to be personal preference and driving style that dictates the choices.

I love my manual and the last day or so ive realised its not as annoying as I thought just at times it can be. I also think that with the slight notchyness in first to second im worrying about a big clutch blow out and a big bill. And i really cant be without my car for work etc.

I think the only thing to do is to test drive one and see how i like it. The price range im looking at is around a 2008 with decent miles so im not sure if drive select was available on that year?

I know the tiptronic isnt anywhere near as quick as the stronic but whats half a second between friends? ha most of what i pull up against on the road anyway are never going to keep up.

You're absolutely right. I would say that if the S5 came with the RS five transmission, I would have considered that. The only other thing is that if you were to ever consider a supercharger, absolutely go with the manual. The limiting factor on the durability of your car with regards to increased horsepower and torque will be the automatic transmission.
 
Well to be honest, if i was even considering the supercharger conversion, id just go buy a second hand RS5 haha is it still about 10-15k for the conversion?
I don't assume that people have the coin all at once to drop on a RS5 -- sometimes you may just want to leave the option open to upgrade the S5 down the road. That's what I did. I have certainly spent enough money on my car to have purchased a RS5 -- but didn't. I now have a car tailored to how I want that I wouldn't trade for a new RS5 :thumbsup:.

It depends on the blower. You could talk to Tony at PES -- you may be able to get the M90 blower installed under 10k -- and you can give Hatchman's mustang a run for his money (0-60 around 3.9-4.0 with a manual and I think -- but can't recall the source -- low 4's with the auto) :thumbsup:. The M90 is a great affordable blower. However, if you want the cutting edge blower, then I am sure that you will be spending $15,000+ on a new PES whipple, new APR eaton, or TTS blower.
 
Fact remains that Audi claims 5.1. I also a fact that I have found folks on the internet that claim down to 4.7 for a stock 2010 auto. Your results may vary.

Anyway, I think we are thread jacking. 0-60 is not the only parameter the OP is interested in.

Once the snow clears, I'll take my 2010 S5 Tip and GTech Pro and see what i get. It is definitely slower than my blown Mustang, which does 0-60 in 4.2 while spinning.
Ok, we can agree to disagree :cheers:

That Mustang must be fun! Did you get it in a manual or auto? Pics of the mustang :thumbsup:
 
I think for everyday road (none track) driving, today's autos (s tronic double clutch in particular) are pretty neat pieces of kit - and as previously noted you do have several options to changing gears inc manual selection if desired.

Purists will favour manual, especially for tracking thier cars, but everyone must admit today's autos are a far cry from the slow clunky boxes from yesteryear.

+1