Audi A5 Forum & Audi S5 Forum banner

Are you iritated by the S5 first gear jerkiness?

26302 Views 71 Replies 44 Participants Last post by  Terminator X
I have a meeting with a regional director of Audi re this issue on Friday of next week. There are many compliants about this "antio stall" feature on the forum, but I don't believe many people have actually reported it back to thier dealer. If you are irritated with the difficulty of smooth take off and smooth driving in stop/start traffic, then please let me know before next friday and I will pass this on. I don't know how to set up a proper pole on this site so either let me know by responding to this thread or possibly some other member in the know could set up a pole for me. Ideally I just need to know roughly where you are based in the world and how long you have had the car.

Many thanks
21 - 40 of 72 Posts
How fast are you shifting? The fly wheel in this car is very light, probably a lot lighter than you are used to, which means that the tach may fall a lot faster than your last car. Speeding up your shifts may solve your problem, especially at low rpms. Maybe it is because my last car had a touchy electronic throttle, but on both of my extended test drives around conjested nj "suburbs" I found 1 -> 2 shifts to be glorious and smooth without ever jarring the salesman. I did find a few launches to be touchy because I am not used to the engagement point on the clutch.

I am not saying you don't know how to drive, I am saying you may be still applying your old habits to new technology. Take a look at what RPM = MPH in both 1st and 2nd gear. And make a conscious effort to match them. You will get a sense of the timing, and then you will fall into harmony.

1 -> 2 Shifts are like sleeping with a woman, the first few times are rough, but once you figure out the rhythms, it is bliss, unless you want it to be rough...

I had a lightened flywheel on my last car. This flywheel is actually heavier. I still find I have trouble with jerky starts in 1st gear. I also have jerky 1-2 interchanges.

I have smoother clutch action and shifting in my '67 Mini without syncros and a clutch slave cylinder that leaks requiring pumping of the clutch.

6 weeks 3,000 miles 2+ hours of traffic jams just today.
also annoyed

Greetings, I have an S5, now with almost 5,000 miles. I have owned many MT cars and the S5 clearly has issues. Obviously, one can fuss around it but the difference between clutch-in and clutch-out and the propensity for engine stall are less than desirable. That said - I love the car!
Michael
You can tell him that I gave up and sold my S5, and that one of the little things that made me do it and that got on my tits was that it was just soooooo bad in stop start traffic.
I used to ignore bottom gear and pull away in 2nd because it was so lively in first.
-You could, if you wish, also tell him it was the most uncomfortable car I've ever owned and that the Sat Nav is IMHO rubbish 'cos it doesn't accept postcodes.
I also have this problem and at first thought it was my driving.feel like i should change my name to skippy when in slow moving traffic.
May be missing the point?

Guys, this isn't about honing our driving skills or getting used to a new car - most of us have owned a wide variety of different cars over the years and can quickly acclimatise to model-specific characteristics such as biting points, gear ratios, power and torque profiles etc. We also accept that some gearboxes will shift more smoothly than others and that a bit of first-to-second notchiness is not uncommon.

To reiterate - what Graham's highlighting is not a gear-change or transmission mechanics issue - that is how it is and we can all accept it or turn-in our cars (ChasTT!). And this thread isn't a confessional for inept drivers who don't share the elevated skill of some of our fellow forum members!

The issue we're discussing here lies with the electronics concerned with managing the engine speed at take-off - it's likely a function of an anti-stall mechanism but I can't be certain. What I'm clear on though is that the characteristics apparent in my 'experiment' (above), make if difficult or nigh-on impossible to drive the car as intended in first-gear stop-start traffic and is without doubt a flaw which, if resolvd, will be to every owners benefit.
See less See more
I tried the revs/clutch test in post 9 and there was no difference.

Stop/start traffic is normal where I live. Indeed, I am not long back home after 30 minutes to travel 4 miles. I have no problems like this at all.

I do find that unless the clutch is really fully depressed (and I mean fully) that the gear change is clunky and jerky. Quite a pain as I have to sit further forward than I would like to compensate. Is it perhaps partly that?
Thanks DD, it's interesting to hear that, if not common to all cars, it's something that can probably be cured! Out of interest, when did you get yours (from memory I think it was a while ago)? If it is an earlier car, perhaps the anti-stall firmware was a later addition? In any case, if that's what's causing the issue, they can happily remove it from my car and put it where the sun is absent. Think I can just about manage not to stall my car, without the assistance of a little German microprocessor!

I'm not technical enough to be able to comment on your last suggestion :)confused: ) but essentially, I can accept the gearchange quality as it is - it's the process of driving in only one gear (i.e. first) that's annoying me!
The last car I had was a 2003 Nissan Maxima with drive-by-wire. The first 10000 miles I had the car I was terrible. My previous car had a daul friction clutch and super light fly wheel and I used to have shifts smoother than my gf's skin. What I learned over time with the drive by wire was to using the old let clutch out and push gas in didn't work. The S5 is a performance car, and isn't going to control clutch engagement like a 3 or 5 series BMW. You are in control, but sadly the drive-by-wire electronic throttle is not what you are used to. Here is what I learned which went against my normal teachings:

1a. Depress Clutch extremely fast
1b. Let off gas completely when clutch is past engagement point (Engine will rev up if you let off too late, and the car will slow down or jerk a little if you let off too soon)
2. Change the gears
3a. Release Clutch and try to have the engagement point catch the right RPMs as you shift. You may hold it at the engagement point for about half a second or so to let the rpms match perfectly

3b. Now this is the hardest part and is what is the biggest pain:
While releasing the clutch, just as it is ABOUT to reach the engagement point, press in and HOLD the gas pedal maybe 10% of the way (no matter what speed you are going). Key here is to not press it in too much or else the electronic throttle is going to think you are blipping the throttle for a spirited downshift, and therefore will rev the engine like crazy. Also letting off the pedal if you think you pressed it too much is worse than just holding it. If you are holding it in too far the throttle will reduce itself while engaging (unless it is almost on the floor), when you let off the gas the throttle will fall quickly and then you will end up really jerking the car.


4. At the engagement point begin pressing the gas more (smoothness is key here) while Releasing the rest of the Clutch quickly.

Sound close to what you do now? I am sure it is, but learning to press the gas in gently at that engagement point took a long time to become second nature, and will make all the difference.

I don't think people "can't drive" or that I have "better skills", I think that this cars electronics are new and after getting used to the terrible implementation by Nissan for this, I can share the experience. I don't blame you for being irritated, it still irritated me some days when I sold my maxima, but, I did learn how to make it work, and yes I still jerked the car some starts when I wasn't paying attention. Especially in stop/start traffic when I was getting frustrated by people cutting in front of me when I was leaving extra room between the car in front of me so I wouldn't have to come to a complete stop.
See less See more
BMW seems to accomplish the same with a little item called the Clutch Delay Valve, which is inline between the slave cylinder and clutch. Looks like Audi uses electronics instead. Either way, it's very frustrating for someone who truly knows how to operate a clutch.
The Clutch Delay Valve makes sure the engine rpms match the speed before the clutch engages fully. It wears out the clutch faster and makes the car feel soft. It is definitely easier to drive, but IMO makes it less fun. An M3 doesn't have a clutch delay valve because it makes it impossble to spin the tires when shifting and greatly reduces feedback to the driver. The delay valve was the #1 reason, for me, to not choose a 335xi. There are days when that smoothness would be nice, but in general, as long as it is just me in the car, I like being able to almost lose grip of the steering wheel or being able to chirp the tires on the 1-2 shift!

After all, the S5 is a performance car that is luxurious, not the other way around.
Request for VAG-COM peek

It would be interesting to know if the anti-stall behavior is a soft settable value via the VAG-COM interface, or is it embedded and not changeable in the Bosch MED Engine Management System. I would think almost anything in the Bosch unit is changeable.

Can someone who has an S5 and the VAG-COM interface look at the Common/Engine or Drivetrain screens to see what is open for inspection?
That may help us understand what is up for mods.
Hmmm, without being in the car, it's difficult to be sure but I can imagine this approach having some effect, if perfected!

I suppose the question is whether I want to bother learning the technique or instead to throw it back at Audi and tell them I want my car to behave like Double D's please!
The last car I had was a 2003 Nissan Maxima with drive-by-wire. The first 10000 miles I had the car I was terrible. My previous car had a daul friction clutch and super light fly wheel and I used to have shifts smoother than my gf's skin. What I learned over time with the drive by wire was to using the old let clutch out and push gas in didn't work. The S5 is a performance car, and isn't going to control clutch engagement like a 3 or 5 series BMW. You are in control, but sadly the drive-by-wire electronic throttle is not what you are used to. Here is what I learned which went against my normal teachings:

1a. Depress Clutch extremely fast
1b. Let off gas completely when clutch is past engagement point (Engine will rev up if you let off too late, and the car will slow down or jerk a little if you let off too soon)
2. Change the gears
3a. Release Clutch and try to have the engagement point catch the right RPMs as you shift. You may hold it at the engagement point for about half a second or so to let the rpms match perfectly

3b. Now this is the hardest part and is what is the biggest pain:
While releasing the clutch, just as it is ABOUT to reach the engagement point, press in and HOLD the gas pedal maybe 10% of the way (no matter what speed you are going). Key here is to not press it in too much or else the electronic throttle is going to think you are blipping the throttle for a spirited downshift, and therefore will rev the engine like crazy. Also letting off the pedal if you think you pressed it too much is worse than just holding it. If you are holding it in too far the throttle will reduce itself while engaging (unless it is almost on the floor), when you let off the gas the throttle will fall quickly and then you will end up really jerking the car.


4. At the engagement point begin pressing the gas more (smoothness is key here) while Releasing the rest of the Clutch quickly.

Sound close to what you do now? I am sure it is, but learning to press the gas in gently at that engagement point took a long time to become second nature, and will make all the difference.

I don't think people "can't drive" or that I have "better skills", I think that this cars electronics are new and after getting used to the terrible implementation by Nissan for this, I can share the experience. I don't blame you for being irritated, it still irritated me some days when I sold my maxima, but, I did learn how to make it work, and yes I still jerked the car some starts when I wasn't paying attention. Especially in stop/start traffic when I was getting frustrated by people cutting in front of me when I was leaving extra room between the car in front of me so I wouldn't have to come to a complete stop.
...Personally I found that my driving style meant I didn't have this problem and I can easily drive to avoid the problem... I have also explained this to guys on the forum... However, they have convinced me that this is not the point... The point is if you want to pull away with lower revs, you can't without balancing the clutch to bring them down and risk stalling. Therefore I support this thread.
...Personally I found that my driving style meant I didn't have this problem and I can easily drive to avoid the problem... I have also explained this to guys on the forum... However, they have convinced me that this is not the point... The point is if you want to pull away with lower revs, you can't without balancing the clutch to bring them down and risk stalling. Therefore I support this thread.
Hi Ian,

Don't forget it has the same effect when down shifting too. If you're driving gently ( with your millteks ha ha ) and you try to raise the revs to meet the engine speed the problem occurs that way too. i.e. if you have contol of the revs and then put you foot on the clutch, off it goes and does it's own thing!
The other thing is, that unless you want to always change from 1st to 2nd at revs higher than 2500, as soon as you engage 2nd gear and lift you foot off the clutch you are in the wacky zone again because of the large ratio differnce between first and second gear.
I seem to have adapted my driving style and don't seem to have this problem now. My take offs and shifts between 1st and 2nd are normally quite smooth now although there is the odd time this is not the case.
OK, I'll take a look this weekend

A5 in Reston, a good suggestion - I'll look but dont intend on re-coding just yet.
Please add me to the list. I am in NJ and have had this beautiful car since November 26. My only complaint was shifting 1-2 . It is the most difficult clutch/shift I have encountered and at the beginning almost embarrassing.Having had a Testarossa ,I knew it wasn't me. Love the car ,drove it up to 101 mph last week and it is flawless,but then you get to an off ramp - and here we go again.
Thanx,
Cathy
'88 Audi 5000,CS Quattro Turbo wagon, '86 Callaway Alfa Romeo, 01 Chevy Silverado Duramax Diesel
My Engineer's Apraisal >>>

OK peeps, for those of you who have read this and other threads, you will know that I don't have an issue with the smoothness/anti-stall thingy... although I DO reckognise it as a problem. To cut a long story short, my driving style is such that I use relatively high revs when moving off out of habit from having a car with a lightened flywheel before this one.

NOW HERE'S MY APRAISAL...

I spent some time today in rush-hour traffic and had plenty of opportunity to play with different driving styles and different revs etc... In summary...

I DO NOT THINK A SOFTWARE FIX WILL WORK.

It is true, the anti-stall avoids revs in the range between tickover ~800rpm and about 1,500rpm by lifting the revs automatically to 1,500 when you touch the throttle thus making it impossible to select anything lower (other than tickover) when moving off. UNFORTUNATELY THIS IS NECESSARY... ...I tried carefully dragging the revs down whilst moving off by careful clutch control and as soon as it hits 1,400 the engine bogs down. This is NOT a software function, but a function of having a relatively light flywheel. There is nothing that can be done to change this, other than changing the flywheel spec.

So, the S5 has a revvy sporty engine and puts power to the wheels well helped in part by the light flywheel. To avoid bogging and stalling issues, they have introduced software assistance. The other option is to have a heavier flywheel without the bogging and stall problems, but which is heavier, lower on power, slower to respond and less free-revving. Not a good option!

Good luck Graham with taking this up, and please people register your name as recognising the problem... Audi should listen. However I'm not sure there's a solution.
See less See more
Well thought out Ian.
Although your UK gang is probably much more knowledgeable that I am in these things, I’ll add in these bits.

The car (S5) is fitted with an LuK single stage dual-mass flywheel with a single plate clutch (240 mm). The assembly is 20.4 kg (44.97 lb). These are fitted to reduce the transmission of engine vibrations to the driveline.
LuK has a brief description of their unit at this link.
http://www.luk.com/content.luk.de/en/products/dampers/zms_sv/zms_sv.jsp

As I understand the technology, dual-mass flywheels are tuned systems and must be matched to the engine torque curve, engine resonant characteristics, and vehicle load curves (including axle ratio/tire size calculations). They work by having a set of springs inserted between two rotating masses (thus dual mass). The springs are sized to soak up some of the resonant vibration from the engine under load conditions.

I suspect Audi’s testing showed the need for the RPM bump to get the torque where it needed to be for a proper launch into 2nd gear, as you observed.

Porsche has been using a DMF for some time, but had to switch to the LuK for durability matters. It is also noted by Rennsport…”This lightweight flywheel really helps pick the RPM up quicker but does require a different chip in the DME to prevent stalling”. (Italics are mine).

So, it looks like this phenomena is not limited to the S5.
See less See more
...Thanks A5inReston... The engine vibration is often called 'torque ripple' because the torque varies throughout a revolution as the cylinders fire and if plotted on a circular graph looks like a ripple. This torque ripple causes a little slap-back in the gearbox as well as vibration in the car... stick a big mass on the end of the crankshaft and the vibration is reduced because the engine can't accelerate the mass fast enough to produce the vibration. Unfortunately, this mass needs to be accelerated when the engine revs and hence reduced power output (HP). Dual mass flywheels help reduce the mass required to reduce the vibration.

I put a 12Kg single mass fidanza flywheel in my A6 2.7T and it flew! But I did have to run the revs up a bit to avoid noise and bogging down / stalling... although running two light-pressure turbos this was not such a problem because of high low-end torque.

The S5 engine seems particularly prone to stalling or beginning to stall from my tests, hence the software intervention. It's my guess that this will be a 'charateristic' we will have to live with as a result of having such a rapid car.
See less See more
OK peeps, for those of you who have read this and other threads, you will know that I don't have an issue with the smoothness/anti-stall thingy... although I DO reckognise it as a problem. To cut a long story short, my driving style is such that I use relatively high revs when moving off out of habit from having a car with a lightened flywheel before this one.

NOW HERE'S MY APRAISAL...

I spent some time today in rush-hour traffic and had plenty of opportunity to play with different driving styles and different revs etc... In summary...

I DO NOT THINK A SOFTWARE FIX WILL WORK.

It is true, the anti-stall avoids revs in the range between tickover ~800rpm and about 1,500rpm by lifting the revs automatically to 1,500 when you touch the throttle thus making it impossible to select anything lower (other than tickover) when moving off. UNFORTUNATELY THIS IS NECESSARY... ...I tried carefully dragging the revs down whilst moving off by careful clutch control and as soon as it hits 1,400 the engine bogs down. This is NOT a software function, but a function of having a relatively light flywheel. There is nothing that can be done to change this, other than changing the flywheel spec.

So, the S5 has a revvy sporty engine and puts power to the wheels well helped in part by the light flywheel. To avoid bogging and stalling issues, they have introduced software assistance. The other option is to have a heavier flywheel without the bogging and stall problems, but which is heavier, lower on power, slower to respond and less free-revving. Not a good option!

Good luck Graham with taking this up, and please people register your name as recognising the problem... Audi should listen. However I'm not sure there's a solution.
Thanks Ian, but next time youre out in "The Black Beast" try the same experiment when the car is rolling at different speeds and you'll see that the software anti stall is speed related.i.e. as speed increases two things happen.
1) Above 5mph and the tickover speed increases from 600 to 800rpm
2) Above 20 mph the amount the anti stall feature raises the revs to progressivley reduces with increased speed and the ability to make smooth gear transitions is far greater.

I know you're going to say that the increased inertia of the car reduces the potential for stalling, but just indulge me and try it for yourself and let me know if you agree.
21 - 40 of 72 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top